Leicester District
National Education Union

18th April 2012

Report From the 2012 NUT National Conference

Pension Campaign

Our pension campaign was debated at length on Saturday afternoon. Discussion centred around the continuation of our campaign and further industrial action in the summer term and beyond. The motion that was passed congratulated NUT members in London for the strike on 28th March and called for further strike action in the summer term and beyond. This will involve establishing a programme of targeted local or regional strikes in the summer term and working to organise a further one day strike before the end of June. It also called on the National Executive to consider whether local action could be sustained (paid) and whether the campaign on pensions could be linked to a campaign on pay in the autumn term.

There were delegates who were disappointed at the lack of a clear timescale agreed, but the mood of conference was very clear that this campaign is not over by a long way and that we need to demand a reopening of discussions with the government.

Teachers' Pay

The government is determined to attack the national pay and conditions of teachers, to attempt to introduce "local pay" and to promote "pay flexibility" and performance-related pay in teaching. The motion, passed unanimously, called for opposition to any efforts to remove or undermine national pay and conditions, and preparation for industrial action (including strike action) to defend them. It also called for a vigorous campaign to increase sixth form pay, with the aim of reestablishing pay parity between staffs in sixth-form colleges and schools.

Commenting after the debate on the priority motion on pay, NUT General Secretary Christine Blower said,

"The NUT is completely opposed to the Government¡¦s plan to attack national pay and conditions arrangements for teachers. Our head teacher members are only too well aware of how difficult it would be to establish their own pay system for their school. Not only would it take an inordinate amount of time, but local pay bargaining in some 25,000 separate schools would create unnecessary bureaucracy, complexity, cost and potential inequity.

"Depressing public sector pay in areas where there is generally lower pay would only serve to further depress local economies.

"The current two-year pay freeze for teachers follows a long period of real terms cuts, when their pay awards were well below inflation and will be followed by a cap on pay. The impact of the pay freeze has already hit teachers hard. The cut in take-home pay caused by increased teacher pension contributions from this month and continued high levels of inflation will make this much worse.

"Cutting the real and relative value of teachers' pay will make teaching as a career much less attractive. It will certainly also inhibit the movement of teachers around the country.

"The NUT will seek to work alongside other teacher unions to defend teachers against any proposals to attack national terms and conditions."

Ofsted

Delegates spoke about the damage that Ofsted does to teaching and to the health of teachers. The motion, that was passed, called on a campaign to ensure that Ofsted is not used as a political tool that is used to privatise schools through forced academisation. It also called for consideration to be given to non co-operation with inspection arrangements as an action strategy.

Appraisal and Capability

Ian Leaver and Jenny Day successfully moved an amendment to the motion on the misuse of capability procedures. It condemned the decision by the new head of Ofsted, Sir Michael Wilshaw, to remove the category of 'satisfactory” and replace it with 'requires improvement.” Michael Wilshaw disgracefully views high staff morale as a cause for concern, despite teacher stress and suicides. This is a pernicious means of further enabling capability procedures to be used to control teachers and encourage bullying.

A fringe meeting was addressed by Alan Munroe, President of the EIS - the Scottish Teachers' Union. The proposal in Scotland is to introduce a system known as 'Professional Update', the key purpose of which will be:

to maintain and improve the quality of teachers and to enhance the impact that they have on pupils' learning;

to support, maintain and enhance teachers' continued professionalism and the reputation of the teaching profession in Scotland.

As well as ensuring that teachers have a responsibility to consider their development needs, the system will assist teachers to identify constructive ways to update their skills, provide access to opportunities to address any areas identified as requiring support and offer a focus on ways in which they can enhance their career. Alan referred to things like 'an open and supportive culture in which discussion and review of effective approaches to learning and teaching becomes the accepted norm in schools' and to 'opportunities for all teachers to engage in ongoing self-evaluation'. It is made absolutely clear that Professional Update has nothing to do with teacher competence, and will instead focus on 'continuous improvement'.

This all seems very positive and miles away from what's proposed by Michael Gove for England, but something to aspire to and relevant for future discussions on joint union model polices.

As things stand schools should not be introducing new policies on either performance management or appraisal at this stage. The NUT, with other trade unions, will be discussing any changes with the Local Authority and will be insisting on separate policies on appraisal and performance management with no direct link between them. Four teacher unions (including the two headteacher unions) have agreed a joint set of principles to help guide any future discussions.

» Principles on teacher appraisal and capability: ASCL, ATL, NAHT and NUT [Word doc.]

We are fortunate to have Amanda Brown, from the NUT¡¦s head Office, coming to speak to our next local association meeting on May 2nd. She will be available to answer all your questions about the proposed changes to teacher appraisal. Further details on the back page.

Academies

An extremely well attended meeting, with standing room only, focused on forced academies and particularly on Downhills Community Primary School in Hackney. Parents have been very active in their opposition to forced academisation, with petitions, a song, events, fund raising and a legal challenge. This parent led campaign has been supported by school governors and staff. The political use of Ofsted by the government to put Downhills into a category has led to the resignation of a much respected head teacher. The campaign by Downhills should give a lead to all primary schools under threat of academisation and provides an alternative to the capitulation being shown by the governors at Queensmead Primary School in Leicester. The government have forced a sponsor onto the school. That sponsor is Harris who operate the Carpet Right chain and it was suggested that demonstrations take place outside every Carpet Right branch in the country.
The motion on academies reaffirmed the union's opposition to the privatisation of education through the expansion of academies and free schools. Currently a school can only return to being a local authority school after a minimum of seven years. The motion called on the Labour Party to make a commitment to reversing the academies programme and to allow schools to return to the local authority should a ballot show that parents and teachers want that.

Anne Blair and Peter Flack successfully moved an amendment to a motion on the economy by adding details of our opposition to privatisation of education through the academies and free schools programme. It also called for the reintroduction of the educational maintenance allowance for young people.

Palestine

A packed fringe meeting heard from a Palestinian teacher and Gerard Horton, from Defence for Children International, about the plight of teachers and of children arrested in Palestine. Palestinian teachers and children face enormous hurdles simply to carry out their daily lives and education under Israel's illegal occupation. See the website for more details:
www.dci-palestine.org

Sixth Form Colleges

Sam Lane from QE spoke on the motion on sixth form colleges, calling on continued support for the sixth form college network. She condemned the cuts in sixth form funding that are leading to redundancies and destroying enrichment and support for students.

A well attended fringe meeting on sixth form colleges discussed the cuts that are estimated at up to 20%. The NUT is committed to supporting strike action in colleges where cuts cause compulsory redundancies or are affecting workload, particularly where managements are pre-empting three years of cuts by making them all in the first year.

There was a lively discussion about the issues affecting members in schools, including launching a campaign to exempt sixth form colleges from paying VAT, which is currently the case in academies!

Phonics

A motion on the year one phonics check asserted that the introduction of statutory testing of phonics for all year one pupils is unnecessary and inappropriate. There is no evidence that learning phonics 'fast and first' has a positive impact on children's long term reading ability or enjoyment of reading. Several delegates spoke about the testing of 'nonsense' and the benefits of instead encouraging reading for pleasure.

Christine Blower said,

"The Year One Phonics Screening Check will tell teachers nothing that they do not already know about the reading skills of the children in their class. A pass/fail test for six year olds is wrong.

"The NUT's own survey into phonics showed that over eighty per cent of teachers do not agree with statutory testing of phonics in Year one, and 84% believed that Reading for Pleasure is a far more important and relevant way to support children's early reading. The Phonics Check with its pseudo-words is confusing for many children - including children who are more fluent readers. 85 per cent of teachers said they were concerned about the impact on five and six year old children who might have to repeatedly retake the test if they failed it. As one respondent put it: 'Five years old is too young to fail'.

"This test is unnecessary and inappropriate for many children with special educational needs (SEN) and English as an additional language (EAL). Many schools are already drilling their pupils twice a day in the hope that the results when sent to RAISEonline will not trigger an inspection which will bring criticisms of their teaching.

"The fact that Ofsted is now inspecting the teaching of phonics in primary schools is a clear indication of the Government's will to permeate its ideology and dogma about phonics teaching throughout the education system. Schools which do not adhere to the strict phonics teaching criteria will face the consequences on inspection day. In addition, Ofsted intend that it is 'unlikely that any provider of primary initial teacher training will be judged as outstanding unless the quality of its phonics training is also outstanding'.

"It is vital that the methods we employ when we introduce young children of five and six years old to reading should bring understanding, reward and pleasure to them. Drilling children to pass a reading test will achieve the exact opposite."

 

Related articles

The next round of pensions robbery (12th November 2012)
Pensions fight continues as unions prepare for more action (20th February 2012)
Government threatens to impose pensions settlement (9th January 2012)
Stop The Pensions Robbery (25th November 2011)
Speeches from the Rally (6th July 2011)
Pictures from the Strike Rally in Victoria Park, 30th June (6th July 2011)
"This is not the situation I thought I would be in..." (17th June 2011)
Let's make 30th June a huge show of strength (17th June 2011)
NUT, ATL & NAHT to ballot for national strike against pension changes (6th May 2011)
Pensions Loss Calculator (4th April 2011)
Let's Fight To Defend Our Pensions (4th April 2011)
Pensions Robbery (28th March 2011)
Pension Robbery (2nd February 2011)
Leicestershire Against The Cuts (2nd February 2011)
NUT National Executive Meeting, 11th November (4th December 2010)
Paying more, waiting longer and getting less (2nd November 2010)
The case for teachers' pensions (18th September 2010)
Pensions - Calculate Your Entitlement (3rd July 2006)
Pensions Meeting Challenges Government Propaganda (6th February 2006)
'Fair Pensions Assure Britain's Future' (5th December 2005)
The Next Generation (5th December 2005)
Pensions - Will They Raise the Retirement Age? (3rd October 2005)
Pensions Action on Hold (9th May 2005)
Government Says, 'We'll Negotiate' (14th March 2005)
Five teachers and an education minister (21st February 2005)
Vote For Action To Save Your Pension (21st February 2005)
Hands Off Our Pensions (6th December 2004)
Hands off Our Pensions (1st November 2004)
Pension Changes: Retirement At 65? (8th September 2003)
Part Time Teachers and Pensions (6th November 2000)
Pay (5th October 2016)
Working together to win on pay (6th September 2015)
School Teachers' Pay 2015-16: Pay Scale Points (1st September 2015)
It's class war Jim... but not as we know it... (14th January 2013)
NUT prepares for fight over pay and education (14th January 2013)
YOUR PAY UNDER THREAT (14th January 2013)
Pay Campaign Briefings (10th January 2013)
Daylight robbery - how much did you lose last month? (24th May 2012)
NUT National Executive Meeting, 11th November (4th December 2010)
No strike on pay for now, but the campaign continues (10th November 2008)
Teachers' Pay - The Campaign Continues (7th July 2008)
Three year pay cut on the cards (14th January 2008)
Broken Promises (10th September 2007)
STRB Report - Performance Related Pay Explained (7th February 2000)
Ofsted Inspectors must not give the impression that marking needs to be undertaken in any particular format and to any particular degree of sophistication or detail (25th January 2017)
Busting myths on Ofsted inspections (15th February 2016)
OFSTED myths debunked (13th November 2015)
Report from Conference (15th April 2015)
'Indifferent' teachers stand up for education (30th June 2013)
...you won't know that I disagree with this inspection regime and that the system is stacked against you (3rd June 2013)
Ofsted Consultation: Have Your Say (6th May 2011)
Let's Put Ofsted Into Special Measures (6th January 2010)
Imagine (6th January 2010)
Classroom Observations and Ofsted Gradings (22nd January 2009)
Ofsted members on strike (2nd June 2008)
Disability Discrimination Act May Hit Schools (10th September 2001)
There Won't Be Any Changes When We Become an Academy. Don't Believe a Word of It! (23rd January 2019)
Still No Need to Rush to Academisation (27th January 2018)
Academies Are Bad For Your Health (8th November 2016)
Two petitions (7th July 2016)
The Government White Paper (30th March 2016)
New academies laws (30th March 2016)
How the government forces schools to become academies (15th January 2016)
Academisation at Uplands JS and Rushey Mead (24th June 2015)
Academies increase divisions between the rich and poor (4th September 2013)
Rushey Mead Secondary School - the fight continues (4th September 2013)
The Fight is on to Save Rushey Mead Secondary School (30th June 2013)
Gove writes to city MPs (12th November 2012)
Academies - not in Leicester! (3rd September 2012)
Academies: the one-way journey (25th May 2012)
Catholic Schools Consultation on Academies (14th November 2011)
Academies in Leicestershire (4th April 2011)
You're Having A Laugh! (4th April 2011)
Say No! to Academies (2nd February 2011)
Academies - get your school on the roll of honour (4th December 2010)
A message from NUT General Secretary, Christine Blower (18th September 2010)
We don't need more academies (14th June 2010)
Don't Trust the Co-op (2nd March 2010)
Sponsor is banned from new academies (18th November 2009)
Academy Up-Front Payment Dropped (9th September 2009)
Support our Schools: Say NO to Leicester Academies (20th June 2009)
Now Riverside May Close (25th March 2009)
Please Support our Schools Say NO to Leicester Academies Campaign (13th February 2009)
Should this man be running an Academy? (22nd January 2009)
Please Support our Schools - Say NO to Leicester Academies (22nd January 2009)
Academies Opposition Goes Across All Unions (3rd December 2008)
5th Annual Report On Academies (3rd December 2008)
Edison Profiting From Education (3rd December 2008)
Snatch! (3rd December 2008)
100 Protest Against Academies (3rd December 2008)
More on Academies: Jeremy Paxman Moment of the Month (10th November 2008)
Please Support our Schools - Say NO to Leicester Academies (10th November 2008)
Collaboration, Not Privatisation (8th September 2008)
Primary Academies on the Timetable? (8th September 2008)
Proposals for Academies in Leicester (7th July 2008)
Sellafield to Sponsor An Academy in Cumbria (7th July 2008)
At least three more city academies proposed for Leicester (2nd June 2008)
You Get Academies Whether You Want Them Or Not (7th May 2007)
Academies (3rd April 2006)
A Fresh Fresh Start at New College! (9th January 2006)
Revolt Against Academy in Blair's Backyard (7th November 2005)
Second Division (7th March 2005)
National Adjudicator Questions Value of City Academy (10th January 2005)
City Academy Consultation (6th December 2004)
City Academy gets provisional approval (2nd February 2004)
City Academy Faces Setback (5th May 2003)
The Book of Job's Comforter (6th March 2000)
Beyond the Wall: Sharing the voices of young Palestinians (9th May 2015)
Sixth Form funding: Teachers strike over government lies (18th March 2016)
Rally for Sixth Form Colleges (17th March 2016)
NUT wins court case to go ahead with sixth form college strike (14th March 2016)
Strike and national demonstration for sixth form college members (9th March 2016)
Sixth form colleges are under threat (12th February 2016)
Cuts threaten sixth form colleges (15th January 2016)
Saving our sixth form colleges (15th January 2016)
6th Form College Ballot for Action (4th December 2010)
NUT National Executive Meeting, 11th November (4th December 2010)